<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Pac Coast u19s Play for Shot at Nats</title>
		<description>Discuss Pac Coast u19s Play for Shot at Nats</description>
		<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:38:17 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/746/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>NorCalRugby says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Griffins brought their best game too, they beat Arizona by two tries and lost to Utah United in a tough lost, 25-15. They were undefeated in their conference and beat Golden Gate twice in season and lost in the playoffs. They are good.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>NorCalRugby</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 23:16:10 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1546</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sacrugbyfan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1536</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well HMRFC, I believe Jesuit beat SFGG 34-19 on 4-30-11. I don't think anyone would argue that Jesuit is the #1 team in California and probably the 2nd best team in the country.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sacrugbyfan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 21:09:18 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1536</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HMRFC says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1499</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, sacrugbyfan, it seems pretty obvious to me given the reporting of this site that SFGG is the top U19 team in NorCal. Unless rugbymag is mistaken? And I meant NorCal, not California, since SoCal is not part of these playoffs obviously.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HMRFC</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 11:01:15 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1499</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sacrugbyfan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[HMRFC, Who is the #1 team in CA?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sacrugbyfan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 08:45:31 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Herb Reich says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1350</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Go Liberty and Coach Candler.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Herb Reich</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 15:29:53 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1350</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HMRFC says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1. Highland Rugby is not affiliated with Highland High School, and to represent them as such is incorrect. 2. These playoffs are a joke. The #1 teams from Arizona and California are not even coming. Ridiculous.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HMRFC</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 09:21:51 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/boys/746-pac-coast-u19s-play-for-shot-at-nats.html#comment-1329</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
