<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Eagle Eye: Eagle Player Assessments</title>
		<description>Discuss Eagle Eye: Eagle Player Assessments</description>
		<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:29:51 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/6450/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>wirugby says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html#comment-16981</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seriously you need to rethink your grades on the props! I understand Alex you think the scrum is an inconvenient disruption to flowing rugby. But the scrum is more important than ever and to say a player was brilliant against russia and okay against Tonga is quite funny. We do not have a scrum that could stand on the same field as canada, argentina or any of the countries we are falling behind of. Notice I did not even mention Georgia who should be no where near us but who embarrassed our forwards last time]]></description>
			<dc:creator>wirugby</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:01:28 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html#comment-16981</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Big Jim says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html#comment-16972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Much like Doug I agree. The props are just not getting the job done in the scrums and the Eagles lose valuable offensive ball and have to work overtime defensively because of it. Fry is not the THD of the future and I don't know why they persist with him. He got pushed around the park in the WC, managed a neutral game against Russia and failed miserably except for 1 or 2 against Tonga. In fact, the only really good scrum was where he collapsed in on the hooker and Clever got the ball out because the scrum stopped moving. I will say that he an Pittman did a good job around the rucks and in the tackle but neither took the balls from depth. Maybe I'm missing something in the USA gameplan but it seemed a lot of ball was taken flat or from a dead stop]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Big Jim</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:43:56 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html#comment-16972</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rugbydoug1963 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html#comment-16966</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not sure how the props get such high marks when they are failing at their primary responsibility. 1st phase possession off of scrums is a shambles. We need props that can scrummage - it is not just an afterthought! For all th echanges in the laws over the years scrummaging remains an important part of the game. I would lose mobility at tight end in favor of an immovable object. A lot of that great defending comes as a result of losing possession due to poor scrummaging.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>rugbydoug1963</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:14:12 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/eagle-eye/6450-eagle-eye-eagle-player-assessments.html#comment-16966</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
