<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>5th Place Good Enough for New York</title>
		<description>Discuss 5th Place Good Enough for New York</description>
		<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-clubs/2691-5th-place-good-enough-for-new-york.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:21:03 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/2691/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Altgrrl33 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-clubs/2691-5th-place-good-enough-for-new-york.html#comment-14294</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but please tell me why we have a WPL in the first place. To play on one of these teams means you need to 1) move (which takes talent away from other teams); 2) funds (cutting out working class players); and it keeps growth in other parts of women's rugby. Get rid if it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Altgrrl33</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 03:48:30 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-clubs/2691-5th-place-good-enough-for-new-york.html#comment-14294</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
