<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Possible Schedule Changes for RWC?</title>
		<description>Discuss Possible Schedule Changes for RWC?</description>
		<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2274-possible-schedule-changes-for-rwc.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:08:58 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/2274/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Perplexed Punter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2274-possible-schedule-changes-for-rwc.html#comment-7316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you want a real Rugby World Cup, make it a 12-team competition. Two pools of six teams and then go straight to the finals. The top 12 teams are pretty easy: Six Nations, Quad Nations and two from Fiji, Samoa, Tonga and Japan...just beacuse they are the 2019 hosts. Everyone plays six games. Then have a RW Bowl two years later with the 12 "next best" countries and the winner seeded into the RWC.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Perplexed Punter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:10:03 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2274-possible-schedule-changes-for-rwc.html#comment-7316</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
