<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>NBC Broadcast of RWC Viewed By...</title>
		<description>Discuss NBC Broadcast of RWC Viewed By...</description>
		<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2006-nbc-broadcast-of-rwc-viewed-by.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:08:22 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/2006/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Rugger64 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2006-nbc-broadcast-of-rwc-viewed-by.html#comment-6643</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I watched the game live on-line, however, it was a European site--wonder what the ratings were for on-line viewing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rugger64</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:12:57 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2006-nbc-broadcast-of-rwc-viewed-by.html#comment-6643</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob1243243 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2006-nbc-broadcast-of-rwc-viewed-by.html#comment-6632</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hopefully for the next World Cup there will be more LIVE games on tv- and since it's in England the time difference won't be too nearly as drastic as it is now. and why can't universal sports play some of the games that are at 8:30Pacific/11:30pm Eastern live? are people really watching "Triathlon" instead?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob1243243</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:52:38 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/2011-rugby-world-cup/2006-nbc-broadcast-of-rwc-viewed-by.html#comment-6632</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
