<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Women's Pacific Mt Conference Official</title>
		<description>Discuss Women's Pacific Mt Conference Official</description>
		<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:05:15 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/1281/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>brownj12 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4374</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can't confirm but I would suspect it is because the rugby program is not part of the Mountain Pacific Conference you linked to and there would be copywrite issues with starting the same type of organization with the same name.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>brownj12</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:41:50 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4374</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Really? says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Everyone is failing to mention that these conferences will have to create their own All Star teams now. Socal, West and Pacific will lose all of these players. How is that helping?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Really?</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:55:34 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SoCalSevens says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why are they calling it "Pacific Mountain" when the federation that all these school are part of for some of the D1 NCAA sports on their campuses is called the "Mountain Pacific"? See http://www.mpsports.org/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SoCalSevens</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:00:07 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4263</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AtLarge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4256</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The D1 Men didn't have one playoff weekend for at large bids. They had 15 AQ's and gave the single at large bid to the conference that was most deserving based on the prior year. Why would a single conference get 7 AQ's in a 16-team playoff??? Better yet, why does such a small division even have a 16-team playoff?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AtLarge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:39:41 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4256</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NCAAorBust says:</title>
			<link>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4255</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've never heard of a conference in "real" collegiate sports where there are sub-divisions that don't play each other. In reality this is 3 separate conferences.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>NCAAorBust</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:36:57 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.rugbymag.com/women's-college/1281-womens-pacific-mt-conference-official.html#comment-4255</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
